International Association
for Cryptologic Research

What are the minimal cryptographic assumptions that suffice for constructing efficient argument systems, and for which tasks? Recently, Amit and Rothblum [STOC 2023] showed that one-way functions suffice for constructing constant-round arguments for bounded-depth computations. In this work we ask: what other tasks have efficient argument systems based only on one-way functions? We show two positive results: First, we construct a new argument system for batch-verification of $k$ $UP$ statements ($NP$ statements with a unique witness) for witness relations that are verifiable in depth $D$. Taking $M$ to be the length of a single witness, the communication complexity is $O(\log k) \cdot (M + k \cdot D \cdot n^{\sigma})$, where $\sigma > 0$ is an arbitrarily small constant. In particular, the communication is quasi-linear in the length of a single witness, so long as $k < M / (D \cdot n^{\sigma})$. The number of rounds is constant and the honest prover runs in polynomial time given witnesses for all $k$ inputs' membership in the language. Our second result is a constant-round doubly-efficient argument system for languages in P that are computable by bounded-space Turing machines. For this class of computations, we obtain an exponential improvement in the trade-off between the number of rounds and the (exponent of the) communication complexity, compared to known unconditionally sound protocols [Reingold, Rothblum and Rothblum, STOC 2016].