CryptoDB
Ray C. C. Cheung
Publications
Year
Venue
Title
2024
TCHES
Revisiting Keccak and Dilithium Implementations on ARMv7-M
Abstract
Keccak is widely used in lattice-based cryptography (LBC) and its impact to the overall running time in LBC scheme can be predominant on platforms lacking dedicated SHA-3 instructions. This holds true on embedded devices for Kyber and Dilithium, two LBC schemes selected by NIST to be standardized as quantumsafe cryptographic algorithms. While extensive work has been done to optimize the polynomial arithmetic in these schemes, it was generally assumed that Keccak implementations were already optimal and left little room for enhancement.In this paper, we revisit various optimization techniques for both Keccak and Dilithium on two ARMv7-M processors, i.e., Cortex-M3 and M4. For Keccak, we improve its efficiency using two architecture-specific optimizations, namely lazy rotation and memory access pipelining, on ARMv7-M processors. These optimizations yield performance gains of up to 24.78% and 21.4% for the largest Keccak permutation instance on Cortex-M3 and M4, respectively. As for Dilithium, we first apply the multi-moduli NTT for the small polynomial multiplication cti on Cortex-M3. Then, we thoroughly integrate the efficient Plantard arithmetic to the 16-bit NTTs for computing the small polynomial multiplications csi and cti on Cortex-M3 and M4. We show that the multi-moduli NTT combined with the efficient Plantard arithmetic could obtain significant speed-ups for the small polynomial multiplications of Dilithium on Cortex-M3. Combining all the aforementioned optimizations for both Keccak and Dilithium, we obtain 15.44% ∼ 23.75% and 13.94% ∼ 15.52% speed-ups for Dilithium on Cortex-M3 and M4, respectively. Furthermore, we also demonstrate that the Keccak optimizations yield 13.35% to 15.00% speed-ups for Kyber, and our Keccak optimizations decrease the proportion of time spent on hashing in Dilithium and Kyber by 2.46% ∼ 5.03% on Cortex-M4.
2022
TCHES
Improved Plantard Arithmetic for Lattice-based Cryptography
Abstract
This paper presents an improved Plantard’s modular arithmetic (Plantard arithmetic) tailored for Lattice-Based Cryptography (LBC). Based on the improved Plantard arithmetic, we present faster implementations of two LBC schemes, Kyber and NTTRU, running on Cortex-M4. The intrinsic advantage of Plantard arithmetic is that one multiplication can be saved from the modular multiplication of a constant. However, the original Plantard arithmetic is not very practical in LBC schemes because of the limitation on the unsigned input range. In this paper, we improve the Plantard arithmetic and customize it for the existing LBC schemes with theoretical proof. The improved Plantard arithmetic not only inherits its aforementioned advantage but also accepts signed inputs, produces signed output, and enlarges its input range compared with the original design. Moreover, compared with the state-of-the-art Montgomery arithmetic, the improved Plantard arithmetic has a larger input range and smaller output range, which allows better lazy reduction strategies during the NTT/INTT implementation in current LBC schemes. All these merits make it possible to replace the Montgomery arithmetic with the improved Plantard arithmetic in LBC schemes on some platforms. After applying this novel method to Kyber and NTTRU schemes using 16-bit NTT on Cortex-M4 devices, we show that the proposed design outperforms the known fastest implementation that uses Montgomery and Barrett arithmetic. Specifically, compared with the state-of-the-art Kyber implementation, applying the improved Plantard arithmetic in Kyber results in a speedup of 25.02% and 18.56% for NTT and INTT, respectively. Compared with the reference implementation of NTTRU, our NTT and INTT achieve speedup by 83.21% and 78.64%, respectively. As for the LBC KEM schemes, we set new speed records for Kyber and NTTRU running on Cortex-M4.
Coauthors
- Alexandre Adomnicai (1)
- Donglong Chen (2)
- Ray C. C. Cheung (3)
- Wangchen Dai (1)
- Sylvain DUQUESNE (1)
- Junfeng Fan (1)
- Nicolas Guillermin (1)
- Junhao Huang (2)
- Çetin Kaya Koç (2)
- Yao Liu (1)
- Zhe Liu (1)
- Ingrid Verbauwhede (1)
- Gavin Xiaoxu Yao (1)
- Jipeng Zhang (2)
- Haosong Zhao (1)