International Association
for Cryptologic Research

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Chameleon-hash functions, introduced by Krawczyk and Rabin (NDSS’00), are trapdoor collision-resistant hash functions parametrized by a public key. If the corresponding secret key is known, arbitrary collisions for the hash function can be found efficiently. Chameleon-hash functions have prominent applications in the design of cryptographic primitives, such as lifting non-adaptively secure signatures to adaptively secure ones. Recently, this primitive also received a lot of attention as a building block in more complex cryptographic applications, ranging from editable blockchains to advanced signature and encryption schemes. We observe that, in latter applications, various different notions of collision-resistance are used, and it is not always clear if the respective notion really covers what seems intuitively required by the application. Therefore, we revisit existing collision-resistance notions in the literature, study their relations, and by means of selected applications discuss which practical impact different notions of collision-resistance might have. Moreover, we provide a stronger, and arguably more desirable, notion of collision-resistance than what is known from the literature (which we call full collision-resistance). Finally, we present a surprisingly simple, and efficient, black-box construction of chameleon-hash functions achieving this strong notion of full collision-resistance. </jats:p>

Chameleon-hash functions, introduced by Krawczyk and Rabin at NDSS 2000, are trapdoor collision-resistant hash-functions parametrized by a public key. If the corresponding secret key is known, arbitrary collisions for the hash function can be efficiently found. Chameleon-hash functions have prominent applications in the design of cryptographic primitives, such as lifting non-adaptively secure signatures to adaptively secure ones. Recently, this primitive also received a lot of attention as a building block in more complex cryptographic applications ranging from editable blockchains to advanced signature and encryption schemes. We observe that in latter applications various different notions of collision-resistance are used, and it is not always clear if the respective notion does really cover what seems intuitively required by the application. Therefore, we revisit existing collision-resistance notions in the literature, study their relations, and—using the example of the recent redactable blockchain proposals—discuss which practical impact different notions of collision-resistance might have. Moreover, we provide a stronger, and arguably more desirable, notion of collision-resistance than what is known from the literature. Finally, we present a surprisingly simple and efficient black-box construction of chameleon-hash functions achieving this strong notion.