International Association
for Cryptologic Research

Algorithm-Substitution Attacks (ASAs) have traditionally targeted secretly-keyed algorithms (for example, symmetric encryption or signing) with the goal of undetectably exfiltrating the underlying key. We initiate work in a new direction, namely ASAs on algorithms that are public, meaning contain no secret-key material. Examples are hash functions, and verification algorithms of signature schemes or non-interactive arguments. In what we call a PA-SA (Public-Algorithm Substitution Attack), the big-brother adversary replaces the public algorithm $f$ with a subverted algorithm, while retaining a backdoor to the latter. Since there is no secret key to exfiltrate, one has to ask what a PA-SA aims to do. We answer this with definitions that consider big-brother's goal for the PA-SA to be three-fold: it desires utility (it can break an $f$-using scheme or application), undetectability (outsiders can't detect the substitution) and exclusivity (nobody other than big-brother can exploit the substitution). We start with a general setting in which $f$ is arbitrary, formalizing strong definitions for the three goals, and then give a construction of a PA-SA that we prove meets them. We use this to derive, as applications, PA-SAs on hash functions, signature verification and verification of non-interactive arguments, exhibiting new and effective ways to subvert these. As a further application of the first two, we give a PA-SA on X.509 TLS certificates. Our constructions serve to help defenders and developers identify potential attacks by illustrating how they might be built.

We consider adversaries able to perform a nonzero but small number of discrete logarithm computations, as would be expected with near-term quantum computers. Schemes with public parameters consisting of a few group elements are now at risk; could an adversary knowing the discrete logarithms of these elements go on to easily compromise the security of many users? We study this question for known schemes and find, across them, a perhaps surprising variance in the answers. In a first class are schemes, including Okamoto and Katz-Wang signatures, that we show fully retain security even when the discrete logs of the group elements in their parameters are known to the adversary. In a second class are schemes like Cramer-Shoup encryption and the SPAKE2 password-authenticated key exchange protocol that we show retain some partial but still meaningful and valuable security. In the last class are schemes we show by attack to totally break. The distinctions uncovered by these results shed light on the security of classical schemes in a setting of immediate importance, and help make choices moving forward.

This talk will propose a new approach for building the next generation of AEAD. In the last few years, researchers and practitioners have discovered that widely deployed AEAD schemes, designed almost two decades ago, have many limitations. These range from uncomfortably small security margins to outright security vulnerabilities. We will discuss foundational theory and concrete designs for the next generation of AEAD schemes. Our designs better support real-world workloads while retaining performance.

Recent attacks and applications have led to the need for symmetric encryption schemes that, in addition to providing the usual authenticity and privacy, are also committing. In response, many committing authenticated encryption schemes have been proposed. However, all known schemes, in order to provide s bits of committing security, suffer an expansion---this is the length of the ciphertext minus the length of the plaintext---of 2s bits. This incurs a cost in bandwidth or storage. (We typically want s=128, leading to 256-bit expansion.) However, it has been considered unavoidable due to birthday attacks. We show how to bypass this limitation. We give authenticated encryption (AE) schemes that provide s bits of committing security, yet suffer expansion only around s as long as messages are long enough, namely more than s bits. We call such schemes succinct. We do this via a generic, ciphertext-shortening transform called SC: given an AE scheme with 2s-bit expansion, SC returns an AE scheme with s-bit expansion while preserving committing security. SC is very efficient; an AES-based instantiation has overhead just two AES calls. As a tool, SC uses a collision-resistant invertible PRF called HtM, that we design, and whose analysis is technically difficult. To add the committing security that SC assumes to a base scheme, we also give a transform CTY that improves Chan and Rogaway's CTX. Our results hold in a general framework for authenticated encryption that includes both classical AEAD and AE2 (also called nonce-hiding AE) as special cases, so that we in particular obtain succinctly-committing AE schemes for both these settings.

In the multi-user with corruptions (muc) setting there are $n\geq 1$ users, and the goal is to prove that, even in the face of an adversary that adaptively corrupts users to expose their keys, un-corrupted users retain security. This can be considered for many primitives including signatures and encryption. Proofs of muc security, while possible, generally suffer a factor $n$ loss in tightness, which can be large. This paper gives new proofs where this factor is reduced to the number $c$ of corruptions, which in practice is much smaller than $n$. We refer to this as corruption-parametrized muc (cp-muc) security. We give a general result showing it for a class of games that we call local. We apply this to get cp-muc security for signature schemes (including ones in standards and in TLS 1.3) and some forms of public-key and symmetric encryption. Then we give dedicated cp-muc security proofs for some important schemes whose underlying games are not local, including the Hashed ElGamal and Fujisaki-Okamoto KEMs and authenticated key exchange. Finally, we give negative results to show optimality of our bounds.

This paper aims to give tight proofs, and thus concrete-security improvements, for protocols for two-party computation. Our first step is to suggest, as target, a simple, indistinguishability-based, concrete-security-friendly definition we call InI. This would of course be a poor choice if InI were weaker than the standard simulation-based definition, but it is not; we show that for functionalities of practical interest like PSI and its variants, the two definitions are equivalent. Based on this, we move forward to study a canonical OPRF-based construction of PSI, giving a tight proof of InI security of the constructed PSI protocol based on the security of the OPRF. This leads us to the concrete security of OPRFs, where we show how different DH-style assumptions on the underlying group yield proofs of different degrees of tightness, including one that is tight, for the well-known and efficient 2H-DH OPRF.

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>A two-input function is a dual PRF if it is a PRF when keyed by either of its inputs. Dual PRFs are assumed in the design and analysis of numerous primitives and protocols including HMAC, AMAC, TLS 1.3 and MLS. But, not only do we not know whether particular functions on which the assumption is made really are dual PRFs; we do not know if dual PRFs even exist. What if the goal is impossible? This paper addresses this with a foundational treatment of dual PRFs, giving constructions based on standard assumptions. This provides what we call a generic validation of the dual PRF assumption. Our approach is to introduce and construct symmetric PRFs, which imply dual PRFs and may be of independent interest. We give a general construction of a symmetric PRF based on a function having a weak form of collision resistance coupled with a leakage hardcore function, a strengthening of the usual notion of hardcore functions we introduce. We instantiate this general construction in two ways to obtain two specific symmetric and dual PRFs, the first assuming any collision-resistant hash function and the second assuming any one-way permutation. A construction based on any one-way function evades us and is left as an intriguing open problem. </jats:p>

We consider a transform, called Derive-then-Derandomize, that hardens a given signature scheme against randomness failure and implementation error. We prove that it works. We then give a general lemma showing indifferentiability of a class of constructions that apply a shrinking output transform to an MD-style hash function. Armed with these tools, we give new proofs for the widely standardized and used $\EdDSA$ signature scheme, improving prior work in two ways: (1) we give proofs for the case that the hash function is an MD-style one, reflecting the use of SHA512 in the NIST standard, and (2) we improve the tightness of the reduction so that one has guarantees for group sizes in actual use.

In Internet security protocols including TLS 1.3, KEMTLS, MLS and Noise, HMAC is being assumed to be a dual-PRF, meaning a PRF not only when keyed conventionally (through its first input), but also when "swapped" and keyed (unconventionally) through its second (message) input. We give the first in-depth analysis of the dual-PRF assumption on HMAC. For the swap case, we note that security does not hold in general, but completely characterize when it does; we show that HMAC is swap-PRF secure if and only if keys are restricted to sets satisfying a condition called feasibility, that we give, and that holds in applications. The sufficiency is shown by proof and the necessity by attacks. For the conventional PRF case, we fill a gap in the literature by proving PRF security of HMAC for keys of arbitrary length. Our proofs are in the standard model, make assumptions only on the compression function underlying the hash function, and give good bounds in the multi-user setting. The positive results are strengthened through achieving a new notion of variable key-length PRF security that guarantees security even if different users use keys of different lengths, as happens in practice.

This talk will make the case, on behalf of a group of authors of many of the recent results on commitment in AEAD, that the community should prioritize and standardize AEAD designs that achieve commitment to the key, associated data, and nonce. We call this context commitment. The main benefit of such schemes is that they preclude practitioners from having to make choices about what parts of the context should be committing. While context commitment has not yet seen the same kind of attacks in practice as key commitment, we expect them to be discovered and, to get ahead of attackers, standardization efforts should therefore target context commitment. We will start our presentation by defining context commitment [BH22], highlighting in particular how it is not formally implied by key commitment. We next discuss new attacks that exploit this gap, including showing context-commitment attacks on recently proposed key commitment-secure schemes [Kra19, §3.1.1], [ADG+22, §5.3], and [D+22]. These hint at a rich landscape of possible attacks, and we briefly discuss frameworks that explore this landscape [BH22,CR22,MLGR22]. Finally, we provide an overview of recent proposals for new AEAD schemes that achieve context commitment, and discuss avenues for future work.

This paper provides efficient authenticated-encryption (AE) schemes in which a ciphertext is a commitment to the key. These are extended, at minimal additional cost, to schemes where the ciphertext is a commitment to all encryption inputs, meaning key, nonce, associated data and message. Our primary schemes are modifications of GCM (for basic, unique-nonce AE security) and AES-GCM-SIV (for misuse-resistant AE security) and add both forms of commitment without any increase in ciphertext size. We also give more generic, but somewhat more costly, solutions.

We give a unified syntax, and a hierarchy of definitions of security of increasing strength, for non-interactive threshold signature schemes. These are schemes having a single-round signing protocol, possibly with one prior round of message-independent pre-processing. We fit FROST1 and BLS, which are leading practical schemes, into our hierarchy, in particular showing they meet stronger security definitions than they have been shown to meet so far. We also fit in our hierarchy a more efficient version FROST2 of FROST1 that we give. These definitions and results, for simplicity, all assume trusted key generation. Finally, we prove the security of FROST2 with key generation performed by an efficient distributed key generation protocol.

Existing proofs for existing Discrete Log (DL) based multi-signature schemes give only weak guarantees if the schemes are implemented, as they are in practice, in 256-bit groups. This is because the underlying reductions, which are mostly in the standard model and from DL, are loose. We show that relaxing either the model or the assumption suffices to obtain tight reductions. Namely we give (1) tight proofs from DL in the Algebraic Group Model, and (2) tight, standard-model proofs from well-founded assumptions other than DL. We first do this for the classical 3-round schemes, namely $\BN$ and $\MuSig$. Then we give a new 2-round multi-signature scheme, $\MSB$, as efficient as prior ones, for which we do the same. These multiple paths to security for a single scheme are made possible by a framework of chain reductions, in which a reduction is broken into a chain of sub-reductions involving intermediate problems. Overall our results improve the security guarantees for DL-based multi-signature schemes in the groups in which they are implemented in practice.

Much of public key cryptography is designed in the Random Oracle Model, which assumes parties have access to one or more independent random functions. Implementing these random functions securely, usually via a cryptographic hash function, critically requires a technique called domain separation. This talk is about how spectacularly wrong things can go when domain separation is not done right, and simple ways to do it right. We begin with a case study on random oracle implementation in the NIST PQC KEM standardization effort, giving attacks arising from poor domain separation on some submissions, and classifying the remaining submissions from dubious to good. We then give a library of proof-validated domain separations that are secure, easy to implement, and usable in any type of cryptographic protocol, not just PQC KEMs.

At the core of Apple's iMessage is a SignCryption scheme that involves symmetric encryption of a message under a key that is derived from the message itself. To capture this, we formalize a primitive we call Encryption under Message-Derived Keys (EMDK). We prove security of the EMDK scheme underlying iMessage. We use this to prove security of the SignCryption scheme itself, with respect to definitions of SignCryption we give that enhance prior ones to cover issues peculiar to messaging protocols. Our provable-security results are quantitative, and we discuss the practical implications for iMessage.

It is convenient and common for schemes in the random oracle model to assume access to multiple random oracles (ROs), leaving to implementations the task --we call it oracle cloning-- of constructing them from a single RO. The first part of the paper is a case study of oracle cloning in KEM submissions to the NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography standardization process. We give key-recovery attacks on some submissions arising from mistakes in oracle cloning, and find other submissions using oracle cloning methods whose validity is unclear. Motivated by this, the second part of the paper gives a theoretical treatment of oracle cloning. We give a definition of what is an "oracle cloning method" and what it means for such a method to "work," in a framework we call read-only indifferentiability, a simple variant of classical indifferentiability that yields security not only for usage in single-stage games but also in multi-stage ones. We formalize domain separation, and specify and study many oracle cloning methods, including common domain-separating ones, giving some general results to justify (prove read-only indifferentiability of) certain classes of methods. We are not only able to validate the oracle cloning methods used in many of the unbroken NIST PQC KEMs, but also able to specify and validate oracle cloning methods that may be useful beyond that.

We draw attention to a gap between theory and usage of nonce-based symmetric encryption, under which the way the former treats nonces can result in violation of privacy in the latter. We bridge the gap with a new treatment of nonce-based symmetric encryption that modifies the syntax (decryption no longer takes a nonce), upgrades the security goal (asking that not just messages, but also nonces, be hidden) and gives simple, efficient schemes conforming to the new definitions. We investigate both basic security (holding when nonces are not reused) and advanced security (misuse resistance, providing best-possible guarantees when nonces are reused).

We bypass impossibility results for the deterministic encryption of public-key-dependent messages, showing that, in this setting, the classical Encrypt-with-Hash scheme provides message-recovery security, across a broad range of message distributions. The proof relies on a new variant of the forking lemma in which the random oracle is reprogrammed on just a single fork point rather than on all points past the fork.

We initiate the study of public-key encryption (PKE) schemes and key-encapsulation mechanisms (KEMs) that retain security even when public parameters (primes, curves) they use may be untrusted and subverted. We define a strong security goal that we call ciphertext pseudo-randomness under parameter subversion attack (CPR-PSA). We also define indistinguishability (of ciphertexts for PKE, and of encapsulated keys from random ones for KEMs) and public-key hiding (also called anonymity) under parameter subversion attack, and show they are implied by CPR-PSA, for both PKE and KEMs. We show that hybrid encryption continues to work in the parameter subversion setting to reduce the design of CPR-PSA PKE to CPR-PSA KEMs and an appropriate form of symmetric encryption. To obtain efficient, elliptic-curve-based KEMs achieving CPR-PSA, we introduce efficiently-embeddable group families and give several constructions from elliptic-curves.

We initiate a study of on-line ciphers. These are ciphers that can take input plaintexts of large and varying lengths and will output the i th block of the ciphertext after having processed only the first i blocks of the plaintext. Such ciphers permit length-preserving encryption of a data stream with only a single pass through the data. We provide security definitions for this primitive and study its basic properties. We then provide attacks on some possible candidates, including CBC with fixed IV. We then provide two constructions, HCBC1 and HCBC2, based on a given block cipher E and a family of computationally AXU functions. HCBC1 is proven secure against chosen-plaintext attacks assuming that E is a PRP secure against chosen-plaintext attacks, while HCBC2 is proven secure against chosen-ciphertext attacks assuming that E is a PRP secure against chosen-ciphertext attacks.